Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9223270›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

Phosphorylation and subunit organization of axonal neurofilaments determined by scanning transmission electron microscopy.

R D Leapman, P E Gallant, T S Reese, S B Andrews

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Physical model for the width distribution of axons.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2009
    Article
  5. Mass of the postsynaptic density and enumeration of three key molecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R D LeapmanBiomedical Engineering and Instrumentation Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4062, USA. leapman@helix.nih.gov
P E Gallant
T S Reese
S B Andrews
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phosphorylation plays a critical role in controlling the function of cytoskeletal assemblies but no direct method yet exists to measure the phosphorylation state of proteins at the level of individual molecules and assemblies. Herein, we apply scanning transmission electron microscopy in combination with electron energy loss spectroscopy to measure the distributions of mass and phosphorus in neurofilaments (NFs) isolated from the squid giant axon. We find that native squid NFs, in contrast to typical reconstituted intermediate filaments, are a relatively homogeneous population containing only eight coiled-coil dimers per cross section. The measured stoichiometry of approximately 1:1 for light/heavy peptides strongly suggests that squid NFs are composed of heterodimers. Furthermore, each heavy chain of the dimers carries at least 100 phosphate groups and is, therefore, near-maximally phosphorylated. These results also demonstrate that scanning transmission electron microscopy combined with electron energy loss spectroscopy at the nanometer scale is capable of characterizing the level and distribution of phosphorylation in individual mass-mapped protein assemblies.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsDecapodiformesMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning TransmissionPhosphorylation

Identifiers

PMID9223270
PMCPMC21512
OpenAlexW1980554235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.