Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9223266›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

Evolution by the birth-and-death process in multigene families of the vertebrate immune system.

M Nei, X Gu, T Sitnikova

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
376citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

376 citing papers in PubMed, 814 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M NeiInstitute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics and Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, 328 Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA. nxm2@psu.edu
X Gu
T Sitnikova
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

THEORETICAL POPULATION GENETICS AND ITS APPLICATIONSR01GM020293 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NEI, MASATOSHI · 1985 to 2009
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM20293NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM020293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerted evolution is often invoked to explain the diversity and evolution of the multigene families of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes and immunoglobulin (Ig) genes. However, this hypothesis has been controversial because the member genes of these families from the same species are not necessarily more closely related to one another than to the genes from different species. To resolve this controversy, we conducted phylogenetic analyses of several multigene families of the MHC and Ig systems. The results show that the evolutionary pattern of these families is quite different from that of concerted evolution but is in agreement with the birth-and-death model of evolution in which new genes are created by repeated gene duplication and some duplicate genes are maintained in the genome for a long time but others are deleted or become nonfunctional by deleterious mutations. We found little evidence that interlocus gene conversion plays an important role in the evolution of MHC and Ig multigene families.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMultigene FamilyAnimalsGenes, ImmunoglobulinMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMutationPhylogenyPolymorphism, GeneticVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID9223266
PMCPMC33709
OpenAlexW2048912867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.