Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9223263›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

Vagaries of the molecular clock.

F J Ayala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Epistatic contributions promote the unification of incompatible models of neutral molecular evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of centralized nervous systems: two schools of evolutionary thought.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. There is no universal molecular clock for invertebrates, but rate variation does not scale with body size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

F J AyalaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-2525, USA.

Funding

POPULATION GENETICS OF SOD, ADH, AND GPDHP01GM042397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE · PI AYALA, FRANCISCO J · 1991 to 1995
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM42397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis of the molecular evolutionary clock asserts that informational macromolecules (i.e., proteins and nucleic acids) evolve at rates that are constant through time and for different lineages. The clock hypothesis has been extremely powerful for determining evolutionary events of the remote past for which the fossil and other evidence is lacking or insufficient. I review the evolution of two genes, Gpdh and Sod. In fruit flies, the encoded glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH) protein evolves at a rate of 1.1 x 10(-10) amino acid replacements per site per year when Drosophila species are compared that diverged within the last 55 million years (My), but a much faster rate of approximately 4.5 x 10(-10) replacements per site per year when comparisons are made between mammals ( approximately 70 My) or Dipteran families ( approximately 100 My), animal phyla ( approximately 650 My), or multicellular kingdoms ( approximately 1100 My). The rate of superoxide dismutase (SOD) evolution is very fast between Drosophila species (16.2 x 10(-10) replacements per site per year) and remains the same between mammals (17.2) or Dipteran families (15.9), but it becomes much slower between animal phyla (5.3) and still slower between the three kingdoms (3.3). If we assume a molecular clock and use the Drosophila rate for estimating the divergence of remote organisms, GPDH yields estimates of 2,500 My for the divergence between the animal phyla (occurred approximately 650 My) and 3,990 My for the divergence of the kingdoms (occurred approximately 1,100 My). At the other extreme, SOD yields divergence times of 211 My and 224 My for the animal phyla and the kingdoms, respectively. It remains unsettled how often proteins evolve in such erratic fashion as GPDH and SOD.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsGlycerolphosphate DehydrogenaseSpecies SpecificitySuperoxide DismutaseGlycerolphosphate DehydrogenaseSuperoxide Dismutase

Identifiers

PMID9223263
PMCPMC33703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.