ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners1997
How general practitioners manage children with urinary tract infection: an audit in the former Northern Region.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using urine nitrite sticks to test for urinary tract infection in children aged < 2 years: a meta-analysis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2019Pooled it
- A nurse led education and direct access service for the management of urinary tract infections in children: prospective controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2003Trial
- What's the catch? Urine sample collection from young pre-continent children: a qualitative study in primary care.BJGP open · 2020Article
- Nappy pad urine samples for investigation and treatment of UTI in young children: the 'DUTY' prospective diagnostic cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Does prompt treatment of urinary tract infection in preschool children prevent renal scarring: mixed retrospective and prospective audits.Archives of disease in childhood · 2014Article
- A survey of the management of urinary tract infection in children in primary care and comparison with the NICE guidelines.BMC family practice · 2010Article
- Vesicoureteric reflux is not a benign condition.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2009Article
- Quantifying how tests reduce diagnostic uncertainty.Archives of disease in childhood · 2007Review
- Management of children's urinary tract infections in Dutch family practice: a cohort study.BMC family practice · 2007Article
- The significance of interleukin 8 in urine.Archives of disease in childhood · 2001Article
- Management of urinary tract infection in general practice: a cost-effectiveness analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2000Article
- Home collection of urine for culture from infants by three methods: survey of parents' preferences and bacterial contamination rates.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000Article
- Variation by specialty in the treatment of urinary tract infection in women.Journal of general internal medicine · 1999Review
- Urine sample collection.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1998Article
- Audit.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byAudit.1997
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary tract infections (UTIs) in childhood are common and may be difficult to diagnose because of non-specific symptoms and technical problems with urine collection. Active management is important because UTIs may cause permanent renal scarring in young children.
aimTo determine how general practitioners (GPs) manage children with suspected UTIs.
methodA postal questionnaire to 494 GPs in the former Northern Region (a random selection of 26.2%) asking how they manage children with suspected UTI and their perception of their training needs.
resultsA total of 333 (67.4%) GPs replied. On weekdays, up to 22.9% of GPs treated children who had symptoms suggestive of UTI without collecting a diagnostic urine sample, and up to 64.8% did so at weekends. Urine collection was satisfactory in 73.2% of boys and girls aged under one year, but in only 50.4% of older boys and 48.0% of older girls, caused in part by the use of unreliably 'cleaned' potties in the older group. On weekdays, up to 87.2% of GPs culture the urine, but up to 4.8% use dipsticks as the sole diagnostic test; at weekends, only up to 58.6% culture urines, and up to 19.1% rely on dipsticks alone. Up to 11.0% of GPs examine urine under a microscope for bacteria to test for UTI on weekdays and at weekends. Up to 23.8% of GPs who collect urines on weekdays wait for a positive culture result before starting antibiotics. At weekends, only 3.9% of GPs build in this delay to treatment, mainly because far fewer take urine samples at all. GPs refer younger children for diagnostic imaging more readily than older ones, and boys more readily than girls at all ages. Although virtually all GPs refer all children under five years, some still do so only after recurrent infections. Over half the GPs wanted more training in managing UTI in children.
conclusionThere is a wide variation in clinical practice by GPs. Some always appropriately collect and test urine samples, treat without delay and refer for imaging after one proven UTI. Some never collect urines, treat blindly and refer only young infants with recurrent UTIs. Many vary their standards of practice from weekdays to weekends. The provision for GPs of clear, local, practical guidelines, drawn up between paediatricians and GPs and backed up with study days, might produce a consistent improvement in standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9219406PMC1313004W2180805840What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.