Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9217974›Full record

ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)1997

Clinical aspects of CAG repeat diseases.

M A Nance

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pathogenic mechanisms underlying spinocerebellar ataxia type 1.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Androgen receptor gene mutation, rearrangement, polymorphism.Translational andrology and urology · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Antioxidants in Huntington's disease.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2012
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Spinocerebellar degenerations: an update.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2002
    Review
  18. Huntington's Disease.Current treatment options in neurology · 2000
    Article
  19. Polyglutamine pathogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 1999
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M A NanceDepartment of Neurology, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA. nance001@tc.umn.edu
Hennepin County Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seven neurodegenerative disorders are known to be caused by unstable expansions of the trinucleotide CAG within human genes, and more will be discovered in the coming years. These disorders share some clinical similarities, as well as some differences, which are summarized here. These diseases have unusual clinical genetic properties related to the dynamic nature of CAG repeat expansions, including instability of the repeat expansion in meiosis, particularly male meiosis; a strong correlation between onset age and size of the repeat expansion; anticipation (earlier disease onset in succeeding generations); new mutations arising from unstable, mutable alleles with a high-normal CAG repeat number; and reduced penetrance for alleles in the low-affected range. Much more remains to be learned about the molecular biology and clinical pathophysiology of this new class of genetic diseases.

Indexed as

Trinucleotide RepeatsHumansHuntington DiseaseMovement DisordersMuscular AtrophyMuscular Atrophy, SpinalMutationNerve DegenerationSpinocerebellar Degenerations

Identifiers

PMID9217974
PMCPMC8098176
OpenAlexW2108709235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.