ArticleJournal of molecular evolution1997
Molecular analysis of the intergenic region of the duplicated Amy genes of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila teissieri.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intergenic regions between the duplicated amylase coding regions (Amy) of D. melanogaster and D. teissieri were sequenced. Their lengths in D. melanogaster and D. teissieri were 4,536 bp and 4,621 bp, respectively. Since homology between the upstream regions of the two duplicated genes was found up to 450 bp from the initiation codon of the Amy genes, the ancestral Amy coding region duplicated together with at least 450 bp of the 5'-flanking region as one unit. Comparison of the regions between the two species revealed that the level of divergence was very heterogeneous. Although the mean level of the nucleotide difference in this region was 0.107, no nucleotide substitution was found in four subregions whose sizes were more than 100 bp. Since the probability of these four subregions being completely conserved between D. melanogaster and D. teissieri was very low, these subregions were considered to have relatively important roles in evolution. Large insertions and deletions were not observed in this region but small ones were observed all over the region except for an about 1-kb subregion. This 1-kb region corresponded to an open reading frame encoding a protein which had some sequence identity with the proteins of the serine protease inhibitor superfamily (serpin). Since we could find a transcript of this gene and the synonymous substitution rate was higher than the replacement substitution rate, we suggest that this gene encodes an active serpin in Drosophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9211732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.