Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9205852›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging1997

Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer.

L R Wiseman, C M Spencer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of Novel Epigenetic Anti-Cancer Therapy Targeting TET Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L R WisemanAdis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
C M Spencer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone in combination with a corticosteroid (either prednisone or hydrocortisone) has shown clinical efficacy as palliative treatment for a proportion of patients (about 35 to 40%) with hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer, a disease which predominantly affects elderly men and for which few systemic treatment options are available. Palliative end-points including pain relief, decreased analgesic use and reduced prostate specific antigen levels (a marker of tumour response) are reached in a greater percentage of patients receiving combination therapy than corticosteroid alone. In addition, there are generally greater improvements in quality-of-life parameters in mitoxantrone recipients. However, combined treatment offers no survival advantage over corticosteroid monotherapy. Neutropenia is the most common toxicity associated with mitoxantone therapy and may necessitate dosage reduction in some patients. Otherwise, mitoxantrone generally has a more favourable tolerability profile than has been established for other cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin with regard to acute adverse events (e.g. nausea/vomiting, anorexia, constipation, alopecia, malaise/ fatigue, oedema) and cardiac toxicity. In conclusion, administration of mitoxantrone plus a corticosteroid can provide palliation for some elderly patients with hormone-resistant advanced prostate cancer, and is thus a valuable first-line treatment for this indication.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCardiovascular SystemDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansMaleMitoxantroneNeutropeniaPainProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsMitoxantrone

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.