Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9204020›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine1997

First two years of a follow-up breast clinic led by a nurse practitioner.

J J Earnshaw, Y Stephenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impact of surgical care practitioners on surgical training.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2006
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Nurse-practitioner-led breast clinics.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J J EarnshawGloucastershire Royal Hospital, England.
Y Stephenson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After special training a nurse practitioner ran an independent clinic for follow-up patients with breast disease. All patients referred to a single surgical firm with breast cancer and most patients with benign disease who required follow-up were included. In the first 2 years of the service 382 clinic visits were recorded (median 5/clinic, range 1-12). The nurse practitioner reviewed 236 (62%) patients alone but involved the consultant surgeon in the remainder. No significant lesion was missed in these patients. The nurse-led clinic is popular with patients and, subject to careful supervision, offers an attractive option for follow-up of patients with breast disease.

Indexed as

Nurse AdministratorsNurse PractitionersBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsContinuity of Patient CareEnglandFemaleHumansOutpatient Clinics, HospitalProspective StudiesRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID9204020
PMCPMC1296259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.