ArticleBiophysical journal1997
Tail currents in the myelinated axon of Xenopus laevis suggest a two-open-state Na channel.
Article in Biophysical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling of single noninactivating Na+ channels: evidence for two open and several fast inactivated states.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
- Cardiac sodium channel Markov model with temperature dependence and recovery from inactivation.Biophysical journal · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Na tail currents in the myelinated axon of Xenopus laevis were measured at -70 mV after steps to -10 mV. The tail currents were biexponential, comprising a fast and a slow component. The time constant of the slow tail component, analyzed in the time window 0.35-0.50 ms, was independent of step duration, and had a value of 0.23 ms. The amplitude, extrapolated back to time 0, varied, however, with step duration. It reached a peak after 0.7 ms and inactivated relatively slowly (at 2.1 ms the absolute value was reduced by approximately 30%). The amplitude of the fast component, estimated by subtracting the amplitude of the slow component from the calculated total tail current amplitude, reached a peak (three times larger than that of the slow component) after 0.5 ms and inactivated relatively fast (at 2.1 ms it was reduced by approximately 65%). The results were explained by a novel Na channel model, comprising two open states bifurcating from a common closed state and with separate inactivating pathways. A voltage-regulated use of the two pathways explains a number of findings reported in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.