Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9196448›Full record

ReviewOccupational and environmental medicine1997

Time to pregnancy: a measure of reproductive function in either sex. Asclepios Project.

M Joffe

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Occupational and environmental medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lipid concentrations and couple fecundity: the LIFE study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Time-to-pregnancy and risk of schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research · 2010
    Article
  20. Reproductive outcome in a cohort of male and female rubber workers: a registry study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

M JoffeDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary's, London.
St Mary's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGrowing evidence of reproductive effects associated with occupational and environmental agents has created the need for research with sensitive and well validated methods. There is a complex relation between manifest effects and underlying pathogenic processes. Conceptions will on average tend to be delayed in a population exposed to an agent that causes embryonic damage, an increase in germ cell mutations, or decreased fertility. STUDYING TIME TO PREGNANCY: Time to pregnancy can be used to measure the degree of delay in conceiving, across the whole continuum of biological fertility, in either men or women. The distribution of time to pregnancy largely reflects a sorting process, as the more fertile couples become progressively less well represented with the passage of time. The basic research strategy is comparison of the time to pregnancy within groups defined by their exposures, allowing for potential confounding factors relating not only to the study subject but also to his or her partner. MEASUREMENT AND VALIDITY: Prospective and retrospective methods are available, and each has strengths and weaknesses. Prospective studies have some theoretical advantages, but have unrepresentative populations and problems of feasibility and cost. Retrospective assessment of time to pregnancy is feasible with a short questionnaire, without intruding into sensitive areas of respondents' lives, with good validity at the group level, and without the necessity of large populations. Potential biases have been identified that can be minimised by careful design and analysis; the principal remaining problem is difficulty in obtaining exposure data retrospectively.

Indexed as

BiasCohort StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalEnvironmental MedicineFemaleFertilizationHumansInfant, NewbornMaleOccupational MedicinePregnancyProspective StudiesReproductionResearch DesignRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID9196448
PMCPMC1128774
OpenAlexW2049391709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.