Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9195117›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1997

Cyclosporin pharmacokinetics in paediatric transplant recipients.

G F Cooney, K Habucky, K Hoppu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cyclosporine A CClinical and experimental nephrology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Phase I study of single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of belatacept in adolescent kidney transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pediatric liver transplantation.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G F CooneyTemple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. cooneygf@vm.temple.edu
K Habucky
K Hoppu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyclosporin is an essential component of the antirejection drug protocol used in the long term management of paediatric organ transplant recipients. This article looks at the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin in paediatric kidney, heart, liver and bone marrow transplant recipients and critically evaluates its relationship to pharmacokinetic data in adult transplant recipients. There are limited data on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin in paediatric transplant recipients (14 publications provide the database) as compared with the adult transplant population. Study design, analytical methodology and age ranges of the individuals differ between studies, making comparative interpretation of pharmacokinetic data difficult. However, significant trends are noteworthy and these may influence dose administration guidelines and therapeutic monitoring standards for cyclosporin in the paediatric organ transplant recipient. The bioavailability of the oral formulations of cyclosporin is highly variable as with the adult population, but there appears to be a correlation between cyclosporin bioavailability and age with both the traditional oral formulation (Sandimmun) and the new microemulsion formulation (Neoral) in young liver transplant patients. Bowel length, presystemic metabolism in the gut wall, type of transplant and time since transplant are contributing factors in the variation of bioavailability patterns in paediatric transplant patients. The volume of distribution of cyclosporin does not appear to differ between paediatric and adult transplant recipients, but systemic clearance is comparatively higher in the paediatric population. In general, paediatric patients require higher doses of cyclosporin to achieve target blood concentrations of the drug which are equivalent to the values used in the adult population. Younger patients (less than 8 years of age) may be managed more effectively with a 3 times daily administration schedule rather than the twice daily schedule which is universally used for cyclosporin in the transplant population. The comparatively higher doses and more frequent administration schedule used in paediatric transplant recipients are the consequence of age-related differences in bioavailability and the possibility of increased metabolic clearance of the drug in younger patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgingArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityBone Marrow TransplantationChildChild, PreschoolCyclosporineDrug MonitoringHeart TransplantationHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantKidney TransplantationLiver TransplantationCyclosporineImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.