ArticleBritish journal of cancer1997
Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with subcutaneous interleukin 2: evidence for non-renal clearance of cytokines.
Article in British journal of cancer, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The circulating cytokine concentrations following administration of subcutaneous recombinant interleukin 2 (IL-2) in combination with interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil used to treat advanced renal cancer were studied. One patient was anephric and on dialysis, and seven had normal biochemical renal function, although five had undergone single nephrectomy. The pharmacokinetics of IL-2 and changes in IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha were essentially similar in all patients including the anephric patient, irrespective of the periods of dialysis, although at some time points, IL-2 concentrations were slightly higher in the anephric patient than in the others. These results show that for subcutaneous administration of low-dose IL-2, renal clearance of IL-2 is not important. This contrasts with high-dose, intravenous IL-2 where blood concentrations are higher and renal clearance seems to occur, perhaps because of saturation of the non-renal mechanisms of clearance. The subcutaneous route is certainly preferred if IL-2 is used in anephric patients and in those with impaired renal function, and it may be generally preferred for most purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.