ArticleJournal of bacteriology1997
Compositional biases of bacterial genomes and evolutionary implications.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 189 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 445 citations in OpenAlex.
- DecBin: Bayesian-optimized deep clustering for long-read metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- 16S rRNA sequence captures microbial functional potential.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- LorBin: efficient binning of long-read metagenomes by multiscale adaptive clustering and evaluation.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A review on the applications of Transformer-based language models for nucleotide sequence analysis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Depletion of CpG dinucleotides in bacterial genomes may represent an adaptation to high temperatures.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Synsor: a tool for alignment-free detection of engineered DNA sequences.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Environment and taxonomy shape the genomic signature of prokaryotic extremophiles.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Genomic Signature in Evolutionary Biology: A Review.Biology · 2023Review
- Phylogeny analysis of whole protein-coding genes in metagenomic data detected an environmental gradient for the microbiota.PloS one · 2023Article
- Viral community composition of hypersaline lakes.Virus evolution · 2023Article
- Mechanisms governing codon usage bias and the implications for protein expression in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Review
- Article
- Review
- Exploring short k-mer profiles in cells and mobile elements from Archaea highlights the major influence of both the ecological niche and evolutionary history.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- INSIDER: alignment-free detection of foreign DNA sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- SeSaMe: Metagenome Sequence Classification of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi-associated Microorganisms.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Extreme Genomic CpG Deficiency in SARS-CoV-2 and Evasion of Host Antiviral Defense.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Ecogenomics of the Marine Benthic Filamentous Cyanobacterium Adonisia.Microbial ecology · 2020Article
- New candidates for regulated gene integrity revealed through precise mapping of integrative genetic elements.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We compare and contrast genome-wide compositional biases and distributions of short oligonucleotides across 15 diverse prokaryotes that have substantial genomic sequence collections. These include seven complete genomes (Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803, Methanococcus jannaschii, and Pyrobaculum aerophilum). A key observation concerns the constancy of the dinucleotide relative abundance profiles over multiple 50-kb disjoint contigs within the same genome. (The profile is rhoXY* = fXY*/fX*fY* for all XY, where fX* denotes the frequency of the nucleotide X and fY* denotes the frequency of the dinucleotide XY, both computed from the sequence concatenated with its inverted complementary sequence.) On the basis of this constancy, we refer to the collection [rhoXY*] as the genome signature. We establish that the differences between [rhoXY*] vectors of 50-kb sample contigs of different genomes virtually always exceed the differences between those of the same genomes. Various di- and tetranucleotide biases are identified. In particular, we find that the dinucleotide CpG=CG is underrepresented in many thermophiles (e.g., M. jannaschii, Sulfolobus sp., and M. thermoautotrophicum) but overrepresented in halobacteria. TA is broadly underrepresented in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, but normal counts appear in Sulfolobus and P. aerophilum sequences. More than for any other bacterial genome, palindromic tetranucleotides are underrepresented in H. influenzae. The M. jannaschii sequence is unprecedented in its extreme underrepresentation of CTAG tetranucleotides and in the anomalous distribution of CTAG sites around the genome. Comparative analysis of numbers of long tetranucleotide microsatellites distinguishes H. influenzae. Dinucleotide relative abundance differences between bacterial sequences are compared. For example, in these assessments of differences, the cyanobacteria Synechocystis, Synechococcus, and Anabaena do not form a coherent group and are as far from each other as general gram-negative sequences are from general gram-positive sequences. The difference of M. jannaschii from low-G+C gram-positive proteobacteria is one-half of the difference from gram-negative proteobacteria. Interpretations and hypotheses center on the role of the genome signature in highlighting similarities and dissimilarities across different classes of prokaryotic species, possible mechanisms underlying the genome signature, the form and level of genome compositional flux, the use of the genome signature as a chronometer of molecular phylogeny, and implications with respect to the three putative eubacterial, archaeal, and eukaryote domains of life and to the origin and early evolution of eukaryotes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.