ArticleImmunology1997
Mechanisms of complement resistance induced by non-lethal complement attack and by growth arrest.
Article in Immunology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Down-regulation of CD55 and CD46 expression by anti-sense phosphorothioate oligonucleotides (S-ODNs) sensitizes tumour cells to complement attack.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2007Article
- Accommodation of grafts: implications for health and disease.Human immunology · 2007Review
- Complement susceptibility in glutamine deprived breast cancer cells.Cell division · 2007Article
- Complement resistance of human carcinoma cells depends on membrane regulatory proteins, protein kinases and sialic acid.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Non-lethal complement (C) attack on K562 cells has been shown to induce a transient resistance to lethal amounts of C. We have previously shown that incubation of K562 with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) caused an increase in both CD59 expression and resistance to C killing and we were interested to examine whether non-lethal C attack caused a similar effect. We here demonstrate that expression of the C inhibitors decay-accelerating factor (DAF), membrane cofactor protein (MCP) and CD59 was unaltered on K562 after non-lethal C attack and that neutralization of these inhibitors with specific blocking antibodies did not reverse the induced resistance. In an effort to understand the mechanisms of resistance we searched for other conditions that might induce C resistance in K562 cells. Growth-arrested cells showed a similar degree of resistance to C killing. The levels of DAF and MCP on these cells were unaltered whereas expression of CD59 was markedly reduced. Non-lethal C attack on these growth-arrested cells induced a further increase in resistance to C killing, suggesting that the mechanisms of resistance were not identical. Indeed, resistance of non-lethally attacked cells was completely lost within 8 hr of attack whereas resistance of growth-arrested cells was detectable for up to 48 hr after returning to cell cycle. These data demonstrate that C resistance induced by two distinct strategies is not mediated by the known membrane C inhibitors. Resistance may be a result of the expression of a novel inhibitor or due to metabolic depletion, a likely common consequence of non-lethal C attack and induction of growth arrest, implying that cells take an active role in C-mediated killing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.