Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9172754›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1996

Alcohol binding to liposomes by 2H NMR and radiolabel binding assays: does partitioning describe binding?

A K Dubey, V A Eryomin, T F Taraschi, N Janes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A K DubeyDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
V A Eryomin
T F Taraschi
N Janes
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

THE EFFECTS OF ETHANOL ON SPECIFIC PHOSPHOLIPID POOLSP50AA007186 · NIAAA · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RUBIN, EMANUEL · 1986 to 2003
$5.9M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA00163NIAAA NIH HHS AA07186NIAAA NIH HHS AA07215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implicit within the concept of membrane-buffer partition coefficients of solutes is a nonspecific solvation mechanism of solute binding. However, (2)H NMR studies of the binding of (2)H(6)-ethanol and [1-(2)H(2)] n-hexanol to phosphatidylcholine vesicles have been interpreted as evidence for two distinct alcohol binding modes. One binding mode was reported to be at the membrane surface. The second mode was reported to be within the bilayer interior. An examination of the (2)H NMR binding studies, together with direct radiolabel binding assays, shows that other interpretations of the data are more plausible. The results are entirely consistent with partitioning (nonspecific binding) as the sole mode of alcohol binding to liposomes, in accord with our previous thermodynamic interpretation of alcohol action in phosphatidylcholine liposomes.

Indexed as

DeuteriumEthanolHexanolsLipid BilayersLiposomesMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, BiologicalMolecular ConformationPhosphatidylcholinesRadioisotope Dilution Technique1-hexanolDeuteriumEthanolHexanolsLipid BilayersLiposomesPhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID9172754
PMCPMC1225205
OpenAlexW2038186782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.