Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9172077›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility1997

L-type calcium current activation in cultured human myotubes.

I Sipos, C Harasztosi, W Melzer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

I SiposDepartment of Physiology, University Medical School of Debrecen, Hungary.
C Harasztosi
W Melzer
University of Debrecen · HUUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The time course of activation of the skeletal muscle L-type calcium channel was studied in voltage-clamped myotubes derived from human satellite cells. The slow L-type current was isolated by inactivating faster calcium current components using appropriate prepulses or by subtracting the currents not blocked by 5 microM nifedipine. The L-type current exhibited a single exponential activation and time constants which showed little voltage dependence in the range +10 to +50mV. Currents blocked by nifedipine could be partially restored by UV-light flash photolysis. When a flash of light was applied during a depolarizing step, the activation time course of the resulting inward current contained a rapid, almost instantaneous component followed by a slower component. The amplitude of the rapid component was different when the flash was applied at different times during the depolarizing step: depolarization first increased and then decreased the fraction of channels which could rapidly be restored from the block by photolysis. Plotted versus time after the onset of the depolarization this fraction closely matched the time course of the L-type current obtained before the block by nifedipine. This indicates that the slow gating recations of the Ca2+ channel remain functional in the nifedipine-blocked state. Large conditioning depolarizations which had been shown to enhance the speed of L-type current activation in frog muscle fibres showed no effect in human myotubes. Numerical simulations using a gating scheme proposed for frog muscle demonstrate that such differences can be caused by changing just a single kinetic parameter.

Indexed as

BiopsyCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalNifedipinePatch-Clamp TechniquesTime FactorsCalcium ChannelsCalcium Channels, L-TypeMuscle ProteinsNifedipine

Identifiers

PMID9172077
OpenAlexW202240888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.