Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9171422›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology1997

Insertion mutagenesis of the lac repressor and its implications for structure-function analysis.

B D Nelson, C Manoil, B Traxler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. TnTIN and TnTAP: mini-transposons for site-specific proteolysis in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B D NelsonDepartment of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
C Manoil
B Traxler
University of Washington · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGYT32GM007270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W · 1985 to 2020
$21.0M
DETERMINANTS OF A SIMPLE MEMBRANE PROTIN TOPOLOGYR01GM046493 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MANOIL, COLIN C · 1991 to 1998
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM46493NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM07270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recently developed a simple technique for the generation of relatively large (31-codon) insertion mutations in cloned genes. To test whether the analysis of such mutations could provide insight into structure-function relationships in proteins, we examined a set of insertion mutants of the Escherichia coli lac repressor (LacI). Representatives of several LacI mutant classes were recovered, including mutants which exhibit fully active, inducer-insensitive, or weak dominant-negative phenotypes. The various properties of the recovered mutants agree with previous biophysical, biochemical, and genetic data for the protein. In particular, the results support the prior designation of mutationally tolerant spacer regions of LacI as well as proposed differences in dimerization interactions among regions of the protein core domain. These findings suggest that the analysis of 31-codon insertion mutations may provide a simple approach for characterizing structure-function relationships in proteins for which high-resolution structures are not available.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli ProteinsMutagenesis, InsertionalBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliLac RepressorsRepressor ProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsLacI protein, E coliLac RepressorsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9171422
PMCPMC179170
OpenAlexW1803669888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.