Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9171082›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1997

Transcription and polyadenylation in a short human intergenic region.

S Brackenridge, H L Ashe, M Giacca, N J Proudfoot

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S BrackenridgeSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK.
H L Ashe
M Giacca
N J Proudfoot
University of Oxford · GBInternational Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The poly(A) signal of the human Lamin B2 gene was previously shown to lie 600 bp upstream of the cap site of a gene of unknown function (ppv 1). However, using RNase protection analysis, we show that ppv 1 has two clusters of multiple initiation sites, so that the 5"cap site lies only approximately 280 nt downstream of the Lamin B2 poly(A) signal. We analysed nascent transcription across this unusually short intergenic region using nuclear run-on analysis of both the endogenous locus and of transiently transfected hybrid constructs. Surprisingly, transcription of the Lamin B2 gene does not appear to terminate prior to any of the mapped ppv 1 start sites, although pausing of the elongating polymerase complexes is observed downstream of the Lamin B2 poly(A) signal. We suggest that this pausing may be sufficient to protect the downstream gene from transcriptional interference. Finally, we have also investigated the sequences required for efficient recognition of the Lamin B2 poly(A) signal. We show that sequences upstream of the AAUAAA element are required for full activity, which is an unusual feature of mammalian poly(A) signals.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19IntronsLamin Type BTranscription, GeneticBase SequenceCell NucleusChromosome MappingHeLa CellsHumansLaminsNuclear ProteinsPoly ARecombinant ProteinsRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidRestriction MappingRNA CapsLaminsLamin Type BNuclear ProteinsPoly ARecombinant ProteinsRNA Caps

Identifiers

PMID9171082
PMCPMC146771
OpenAlexW2143734169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.