Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9167997›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health perspectives1997

Medical hypothesis: bifunctional genetic-hormonal pathways to breast cancer.

D L Davis, N T Telang, M P Osborne, H L Bradlow

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health perspectives, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Chemoprevention of Rat Mammary Carcinogenesis by Apiaceae Spices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breast cancer and MCS in EHP.Environmental health perspectives · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D L DavisWorld Resources Institute, Washington, DC 20006, USA. devra@wri.org
N T Telang
M P Osborne
H L Bradlow
World Resources Institute · US

Funding

RETINOIDS AND EPITHELIAL DIFFERENTIATIONP30CA029502 · NCI · STRANG CANCER PREVENTION CENTER · PI RIVLIN, RICHARD S · 2002 to 2006
$4.1M
ZINC AS A BIOLOGICAL RESPONSE MODIFIERP01CA029502 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI RIVLIN, RICHARD S · 1985 to 2000
$360k
IN VITRO INDUCTION &MODULATION OF MAMMARY PRENEOPLASIAR29CA044741 · NCI · MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOR CANCER &ALLIED DI · PI TELANG, NITIN T · 1988 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS CA 29502NCI NIH HHS CA44741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As inherited germ line mutations, such as loss of BRCA1 or AT, account for less than 5% of all breast cancer, most cases involve acquired somatic perturbations. Cumulative lifetime exposure to bioavailable estradiol links most known risk factors (except radiation) for breast cancer. Based on a series of recent experimental and epidemiologic findings, we hypothesize that the multistep process of breast carcinogenesis results from exposure to endogenous or exogenous hormones, including phytoestrogens that directly or indirectly alter estrogen metabolism. Xenohormones are defined as xenobiotic materials that modify hormonal production; they can work bifunctionally, through genetic or hormonal paths, depending on the periods and extent of exposure. As for genetic paths, xenohormones can modify DNA structure or function. As for hormonal paths, two distinct mechanisms can influence the potential for aberrant cell growth: compounds can directly bind with endogenous hormone or growth factor receptors affecting cell proliferation or compounds can modify breast cell proliferation altering the formation of hormone metabolites that influence epithelial-stromal interaction and growth regulation. Beneficial xenohormones, such as indole-3-carbinol, genistein, and other bioflavonoids, may reduce aberrant breast cell proliferation, and influence the rate of DNA repair or apoptosis and thereby influence the genetic or hormonal microenvironments. Upon validation with appropriate in vitro and in vivo studies, biologic markers of the risk for breast cancer, such as hormone metabolites, total bioavailable estradiol, and free radical generators can enhance cancer detection and prevention.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDNA DamageEstrogensEstrogens, Non-SteroidalFemaleHormonesHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasms, Hormone-DependentRisk FactorsXenobioticsEstrogensEstrogens, Non-SteroidalHormonesXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID9167997
PMCPMC1469908
OpenAlexW2049545360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.