ReviewMolecular biotechnology1997
In vivo versus in vitro screening or selection for catalytic activity in enzymes and abzymes.
Review in Molecular biotechnology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Directed evolution of an extremely fast phosphotriesterase by in vitro compartmentalization.The EMBO journal · 2003Article
- Investigating the target recognition of DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase HhaI by library selection using in vitro compartmentalisation.Nucleic acids research · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent development of catalytic antibodies and the introduction of new techniques to generate huge libraries of random mutants of existing enzymes have created the need for powerful tools for finding in large populations of cells those producing the catalytically most active proteins. Several approaches have been developed and used to reach this goal. The screening techniques aim at easily detecting the clones producing active enzymes or abzymes; the selection techniques are designed to extract these clones from mixtures. These techniques have been applied both in vivo and in vitro. This review describes the advantages and limitations of the various methods in terms of ease of use, sensitivity, and convenience for handling large libraries. Examples are analyzed and tentative rules proposed. These techniques prove to be quite powerful to study the relationship between structure and function and to alter the properties of enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9163721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.