Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9163475›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1997

Evaluation of a rapid enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis.

L Kraoul, H Adjmi, V Lavarde, J F Pays, C Tourte-Schaefer, C Hennequin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a salivary IgA detection method for accurate diagnosis of amebiasis.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  3. Tropical medicine and health · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2003
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L KraoulLaboratoire de Microbiologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.
H Adjmi
V Lavarde
J F Pays
C Tourte-Schaefer
C Hennequin
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the capability of rapid enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect antiamoebic antibodies during hepatic amoebiasis with those of indirect hemagglutination and latex agglutination. EIA is simple to perform and rapid (20 min) and does not require any special equipment (optical reading is sufficient). EIA of 143 sera (including 43 from patients with proven hepatic amoebic abscess, 33 from patients with other hepatic disorders and/or parasitic infections, and 67 from healthy individuals) yielded a specificity, a sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values of 100, 93, 100, and 97.1, respectively. This test could thus be considered another valuable tool for the diagnosis of hepatic amoebiasis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanEntamoeba histolyticaEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEvaluation Studies as TopicHemagglutination TestsHumansLatex Fixation TestsLiver Abscess, AmebicPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID9163475
PMCPMC229780
OpenAlexW2126667230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.