Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9163467›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology1997

Performance of an automated Q-beta replicase amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinical trial.

J H Smith, G Radcliffe, S Rigby, D Mahan, D J Lane, J D Klinger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J H SmithVysis Inc., Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, USA.
G Radcliffe
S Rigby
D Mahan
D J Lane
J D Klinger
Downers Grove Public Library · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present data from a clinical trial study in which an automated version (Galileo) of a previously described Q-Beta replicase-amplified probe assay (J. S. Shah et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1435-1441, 1995) was used for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in sputum. The assay was designed to target specific regions of 23S rRNA found in M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium africanum, and Mycobacterium microti and had a sensitivity ranging from approximately <10 to 300 CFU. The assay was tested for cross-hybridization by using large numbers (e.g., 10(5)to 10(10) CFU/assay) of 133 other organisms commonly found in respiratory tract samples, including non-M. tuberculosis Mycobacterium spp., other bacteria, fungi, and viruses. All of these competitors tested negative by the assay. Automated assay results for 780 respiratory tract samples (sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens) collected and tested at three trial sites in the United States) were compared with the results of culture and acid-fast microscopy. Aliquots of conventionally digested and decontaminated sputum pellets were heated at 100 degrees C and mechanically disrupted prior to hybridization and background reduction, amplification, and detection in a closed disposable test pack. Pertinent elements of individual patient histories relating to tuberculosis exposure, previous active disease, antituberculosis therapy status, etc., were considered in the resolution of discrepant results for 48 (assay false-positive) samples. Seventy-one of 90 (78.9%) culture-positive samples were positive when tested in the Galileo assay, while 7% of culture-negative samples were assay positive, corresponding to a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 93%. Following resolution of discrepant results by chart review, the sensitivity and specificity for the Q-Beta replicase amplification assay with the Galileo analyzer were 84 and 97%, respectively. A total of 69.2% of smear-negative (culture positive) samples were detected by the assay. Ten test packs at a time were automatically processed by the Galileo analyzer without operator intervention following loading of samples. The first result was reported in approximately 3 h, and the last result was available in 6.5 h. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a clinical study with a fully automated amplification probe hybridization assay for the detection of pathogens directly from a clinical specimen.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesQ beta ReplicaseBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidHumansMycobacteriumMycobacterium tuberculosisRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSensitivity and SpecificitySputumStaining and LabelingTuberculosisUnited StatesQ beta ReplicaseRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID9163467
PMCPMC229772
OpenAlexW2105655669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.