Trial reportJournal of clinical microbiology1997
Performance of an automated Q-beta replicase amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinical trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, M. avium, and M. intracellulare in sputum samples.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2003Article
- Rapid-cycle PCR and fluorimetry for detection of mycobacteria.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2002Article
- Comparison of PCR, culture, and histopathology for diagnosis of tuberculous pericarditis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1997Article
- Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum by using a prototype automated Q-beta replicase assay.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present data from a clinical trial study in which an automated version (Galileo) of a previously described Q-Beta replicase-amplified probe assay (J. S. Shah et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1435-1441, 1995) was used for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in sputum. The assay was designed to target specific regions of 23S rRNA found in M. tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium africanum, and Mycobacterium microti and had a sensitivity ranging from approximately <10 to 300 CFU. The assay was tested for cross-hybridization by using large numbers (e.g., 10(5)to 10(10) CFU/assay) of 133 other organisms commonly found in respiratory tract samples, including non-M. tuberculosis Mycobacterium spp., other bacteria, fungi, and viruses. All of these competitors tested negative by the assay. Automated assay results for 780 respiratory tract samples (sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens) collected and tested at three trial sites in the United States) were compared with the results of culture and acid-fast microscopy. Aliquots of conventionally digested and decontaminated sputum pellets were heated at 100 degrees C and mechanically disrupted prior to hybridization and background reduction, amplification, and detection in a closed disposable test pack. Pertinent elements of individual patient histories relating to tuberculosis exposure, previous active disease, antituberculosis therapy status, etc., were considered in the resolution of discrepant results for 48 (assay false-positive) samples. Seventy-one of 90 (78.9%) culture-positive samples were positive when tested in the Galileo assay, while 7% of culture-negative samples were assay positive, corresponding to a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 93%. Following resolution of discrepant results by chart review, the sensitivity and specificity for the Q-Beta replicase amplification assay with the Galileo analyzer were 84 and 97%, respectively. A total of 69.2% of smear-negative (culture positive) samples were detected by the assay. Ten test packs at a time were automatically processed by the Galileo analyzer without operator intervention following loading of samples. The first result was reported in approximately 3 h, and the last result was available in 6.5 h. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a clinical study with a fully automated amplification probe hybridization assay for the detection of pathogens directly from a clinical specimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.