ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1997
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from sputum by using a prototype automated Q-beta replicase assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of an automated Q-beta replicase amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a clinical trial.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1997Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have adapted an assay for the direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using a prototype automated instrument platform in which probes are amplified with Q-beta replicase. The assay was based on amplification of specific detector probe following four cycles of background reduction (reversible target capture) in a closed disposable pack. The assay signal was the time required for fluorescence to exceed background levels (response time [RT]). RT was inversely related to the number of M. tuberculosis rRNA target molecules in the sample. Equivalent signals and noises were observed in assays containing either sputum or buffer. All mock samples containing > or = 10 CFU of M. tuberculosis responded in the assay (average RT, 13.91 min), while most (83%) samples containing as many as 10(7) CFU of Mycobacterium avium gave no response during a 25-min amplification reaction. The samples containing M. avium which did respond had an average RT of 17.04 min. Seventy-five percent (167 of 223) of samples containing no target gave no responses; the remaining 25% had an average RT of 15.53 min. Eighty-three frozen sputum samples were tested to develop a candidate cutoff RT for the assay prior to more extensive clinical testing. After resolution of discrepant results and with a 14-min RT cutoff, 30 of 38 M. tuberculosis-positive samples were positive by the assay; 1 of 45 negative samples responded within 14 min. Assay sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negatives predictive values in this pilot study were 79, 98, 97, and 85%, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.