Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9163440›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology1997

Rapid identification and fingerprinting of Candida krusei by PCR-based amplification of the species-specific repetitive polymorphic sequence CKRS-1.

A Carlotti, F Chaib, A Couble, N Bourgeois, V Blanchard, J Villard

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Mechanisms of AcquiredAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular Strain Typing of Clinical Isolates,Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular differentiation of seven Malassezia species.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2000
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A CarlottiLaboratoire de Mycologie Fondamentale et Appliquée aux BiotechnologiesIndustrielles, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Claude Bernard Lyon-I, France. arnaud.carlotti@univ-lyon1.fr
F Chaib
A Couble
N Bourgeois
V Blanchard
J Villard
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A PCR method was developed to identify and fingerprint Candida krusei isolates simply and rapidly. The primer pair Arno1 and Arno2 was designed to amplify the polymorphic species-specific repetitive sequence CKRS-1 (C. krusei repeated sequence 1) that we identified in the nontranscribed intergenic regions (IGRs) of rRNA genes in C. krusei LMCK31. The specificity, sensitivity, reproducibility, and fingerprinting ability of the PCR assay were evaluated. Amplification products were obtained from all 131 C. krusei isolates studied. No other yeast species of medical importance (n = 26), including species similar to C. krusei, species of pathogenic filamentous fungi, or a variety of pathogenic bacteria, yielded a PCR product with these primers. This PCR assay allowed for the identification of C. krusei in less than 6 h. The PCR assay was sensitive enough to detect as little as 10 to 100 fg of C. krusei-purified DNA and proved to be reproducible. Since amplification products varied both in number and in molecular weight according to the strains, PCR patterns allowed strains to be distinguished. To ascertain the epidemiological usefulness of this PCR fingerprinting, the patterns of the 131 isolates were compared. A total of 95 types which corresponded to 95 independent strains were delineated (discriminatory power = 1 with n = 95). Comparison of the results of PCR fingerprinting and those of fingerprinting with the CkF1,2 probe showed that they concurred. In addition, this work yields insights into the mechanisms involved in generating polymorphisms in the IGRs of C. krusei. Since this method is simpler and faster than established identification and genotyping methods of this important pathogenic species, it is a critical improvement for clinical microbiology laboratories relevant not only to diagnosis but also to epidemiology.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticCandidaCandidiasisDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingDNA PrimersHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidReproducibility of ResultsRNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 5SSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 25SRNA, Ribosomal, 5S

Identifiers

PMID9163440
PMCPMC229745
OpenAlexW2111003086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.