ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1997
The use of other drugs to allow a lower dosage of cyclosporin to be used. Therapeutic and pharmacoeconomic considerations.
Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diltiazem co treatment with cyclosporine for induction of disease remission in sight-threatening non-infectious intraocular inflammation.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2017Trial
- Effects of berberine on the blood concentration of cyclosporin A in renal transplanted recipients: clinical and pharmacokinetic study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2005Trial
- Diltiazem co-treatment in renal transplant patients receiving microemulsion cyclosporin.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2003Trial
- Prevalence and nature of potential drug-drug interactions among kidney transplant patients in a German intensive care unit.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2017Observational
- Personalized Medicine: New Perspectives for the Diagnosis and the Treatment of Renal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Cyclosporine/ketoconazole reduces treatment costs for nephrotic syndrome.Indian journal of nephrology · 2013Article
- Pharmacogenomics: a new paradigm to personalize treatments in nephrology patients.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2010Review
- Impact of the cyclosporine-ketoconazole interaction in children with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2006Article
- Calcium channel blocker class heterogeneity: select aspects of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2005Review
- Co-administration of cyclosporine and ketoconazole in idiopathic childhood nephrosis.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2004Article
- Cyclosporin therapeutic drug monitoring--an established service revisited.The Clinical biochemist. Reviews · 2003Article
- Mechanisms of clinically relevant drug interactions associated with tacrolimus.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2002Review
- Effects of the antifungal agents on oxidative drug metabolism: clinical relevance.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2000Review
- Cytochrome P450 3A: ontogeny and drug disposition.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1999Review
- Inhibition and induction of cytochrome P450 and the clinical implications.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 1998Review
- Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in oncology.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 1998Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its discovery in 1970, and introduction into clinical practice in 1978, cyclosporin has become the most important immunosuppressive drug used to prevent organ transplant rejection. This has been achieved by virtue of the improved graft survival rates and adverse effect profiles in patients when compared with that of the older agents. Cyclosporin is substantially more expensive (both to provide and to monitor) however, and the magnitude of these costs may preclude its use, particularly where the transplant recipient is required to pay. Cyclosporin has a complex pharmacokinetic profile with poor absorption, extensive metabolism to more than 30 metabolites and considerable inter- and intrapatient variability. Many transplant centres routinely use drugs ("cyclosporin-sparing agents') to allow a reduction in the dosage of cyclosporin while maintaining therapeutic blood cyclosporin concentrations. The use of a second drug to affect the pharmacokinetic profile of a primary drug is not new, but the use of cyclosporin-sparing agents is a departure from previous practices in that this coprescription is primarily for economic reasons. The decision to use these agents (and the choice of agent) is based upon economic and other factors including the extent of the cyclosporin-sparing effect, the potential for additional therapeutic benefit and/or adverse effects. The coprescription of cyclosporin-sparing agents is ethically more acceptable where the transplant recipient is the economic beneficiary but where the savings accrue to a third party it is more difficult. Benefits to the community at large must be balanced against the risk of adverse effects to the patient. The use of cyclosporin-sparing agents may reduce compliance and hence, jeopardise transplant and/or recipient outcomes. The transplant recipient must be informed about the reasons for their use and advised to consult an experienced physician or pharmacist before altering the established drug regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.