Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9154985›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology1997

High content, size and distribution of single-stranded DNA in the mitochondria of Chenopodium album (L.).

S Backert, R Lurz, O A Oyarzabal, T Börner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. DNA Repair and the Stability of the Plant Mitochondrial Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

S BackertInstitut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
R Lurz
O A Oyarzabal
T Börner
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEAuburn University · USMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial (mt) DNA of higher plants is unique in its large size and complexity. We report here a hitherto unknown feature, the presence of large quantities of single-stranded (ss) DNA. About 2.0-8.5% of the chromosomal mtDNA from a suspension culture (depending on the growth stage) and 6.5% of the chromosomal mtDNA from whole plants of Chenopodium album were found to be in ss form by dot-blot hybridization after neutral transfer. Similar amounts of ss mtDNA were observed by binding of the single-strand binding (SSB) protein of Escherichia coli under the electron microscope. Significantly less ssDNA was found in plastids of C. album and in E. coli cells. We observed ss regions between 100 and 22,800 bases distributed in the mt genome spaced from 0.5-100 kb apart. After pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), the well-bound fraction of mtDNA (found to consist of circular, sigma-shaped and rosette-like molecules), contained the major part of ssDNA as opposed to the migrating linear molecules. Digestion of mtDNA by ss-specific nucleases followed by PFGE mobilized all well-bound DNA and correspondingly increased the quantity of migrating linear DNA molecules. The implications of ssDNA for the structural organization on plant mt genomes are discussed.

Indexed as

DeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantDNA, Single-StrandedElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldMitochondriaMolecular WeightPlantsPlastidsDeoxyribonucleasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID9154985
OpenAlexW2168631698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.