ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience1997
The role of inhibition in an associative memory model of the olfactory bulb.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing complexity, performance and plausibility to meta learn plasticity rules in recurrent spiking networks.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Regimes and mechanisms of transient amplification in abstract and biological neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Complementary Inhibitory Weight Profiles Emerge from Plasticity and Allow Flexible Switching of Receptive Fields.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Inhibitory connectivity defines the realm of excitatory plasticity.Nature neuroscience · 2018Article
- A probabilistic approach to demixing odors.Nature neuroscience · 2017Article
- Mechanisms of lateral inhibition in the olfactory bulb: efficiency and modulation of spike-evoked calcium influx into granule cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2003Article
- Associative memory and segmentation in an oscillatory neural model of the olfactory bulb.Journal of computational neuroscience · 1998Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The external plexiform layer is where the interactions between the mitral (excitatory) and granule (inhibitory) cells of the olfactory bulb (OB) take place. Two outstanding features of these interactions are that they are dendrodendritic and that there seem to be none between excitatory cells. The latter are usually credited with the role of forming Hebbian cell assemblies. Hence, it would seem that this structure lacks the necessary ingredients for an associative memory system. In this article we show that in spite of these two properties this system can serve as an associative memory. Our model incorporates the essential anatomical characteristics of the OB. The memories in our system, defined by Hebbian mitral assemblies, are activated via the interactions with the inhibitory granule cells. The nonlinearity is introduced in our model via a sigmoid function that describes neurotransmitter release in reciprocal dendrodendritic synapses. The capacity (maximal number of odors that can be memorized) depends on the sparseness of coding that is being used. For very low memory activities, the capacity grows as a fractional power of the number of neurons. We validate the theoretical results by numerical simulations. An interesting result of our model is that its capacity increases as a function of the ratio of inhibitory to excitatory populations. This may provide an explanation for the dominance of inhibitory cells in the olfactory bulb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9154523What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.