Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9149881›Full record

ArticleBioTechniques1997

Optimization of cellular ELISA for assay of surface antigens on human synoviocytes.

D D Smith, C B Cohick, H B Lindsley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BioTechniques, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fully human monoclonal antibody targeting activated ADAM10 on colorectal cancer cells.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

D D SmithUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA. dsmith5@kumc.edu
C B Cohick
H B Lindsley

Funding

Recovery of Speech in Apraxia of SpeechR15DC011136 · NIDCD · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SHUSTER, LINDA I. · 2011 to 2011
$432k
NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC011136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (CELISA) permits assay of cell surface antigens on intact fixed cells. Using a monolayer of cells as the solid phase, the CELISA offers an inexpensive alternative to flow cytometry. In addition, this protocol has the decided advantages of miniaturization (small numbers of cells) and ease of replication (the 96-well cluster plate format). In efforts to optimize CELISA for detecting surface antigens on human fibroblastlike synoviocytes, the authors found that cell number, serum proteins, choice of culture plate, pipetting technique and fixatives may all impact the results of the CELISA.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceBloodCell AdhesionCell LineCulture MediaElectrochemistryEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFixativesFlow CytometryHumansSynovial MembraneAntigens, SurfaceCulture MediaFixatives

Identifiers

PMID9149881
PMCPMC4453829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.