ReviewWorld journal of urology1997
Molecular and immunopathology studies of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes in bladder cancer.
Review in World journal of urology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increased expression of HPV-E7 oncoprotein correlates with a reduced level of pRb proteins via high viral load in cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Review
- p53 deficiency provokes urothelial proliferation and synergizes with activated Ha-ras in promoting urothelial tumorigenesis.Oncogene · 2004Article
- Urinary bladder transitional cell carcinogenesis is associated with down-regulation of NF1 tumor suppressor gene in vivo and in vitro.The American journal of pathology · 1999Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Target genes implicated in cellular transformation and tumor progression have been divided into two categories: proto-oncogenes (that when activated become dominant events characterized by gain of function) and tumor-suppressor genes (recessive events characterized by the loss of function). Alterations in proto-oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes seem equally prevalent among human cancers. Multiple mutations appear to be required to conform the malignant phenotype. It is therefore conceivable that cancer be viewed fundamentally as a genetic disease entailing inherited (also called germ-line) and/or acquired (also termed somatic) mutations of genes in these two categories. Molecular studies of bladder neoplasms have identified a series of nonrandom genetic alterations affecting a particular set of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes. Because the modality of therapy for patients with bladder neoplasms primarily depends on morphological evaluation and clinical staging, the diagnosis carries significant consequences. However, it is well known that morphologically similar tumors presenting in any assigned stage may behave in radically different fashions, which seriously hampers the physician's ability accurately to predict clinical behavior in a given case. Recent studies have shown that inactivation of certain tumor-suppressor genes, such as RB and TP53, occur in bladder tumors that have a more aggressive clinical outcome and poor prognosis. In the present paper we review the molecular abnormalities associated with these dominant and recessive genes in bladder cancer and discuss the potential clinical use of their detection. The implementation of objective predictive assays to identify these alterations in clinical material will enhance our ability to assess tumor biological activities and to design effective treatment regimens. The need now is to translate this newly developed scientific knowledge into diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, which in turn will enhance the quality of life and prolong the survival of patients with bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.