Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9144239›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America1997

Comparison of parametric and nonparametric methods to map oligogenes by linkage.

P Liò, N E Morton

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pseudoautosomal linkage of Hodgkin disease.American journal of human genetics · 1999
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  7. Allelic association under map error and recombinational heterogeneity: a tale of two sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
  8. Significance levels in complex inheritance.American journal of human genetics · 1998
    Article
  9. Mapping a disease locus by allelic association.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

P LiòHuman Genetics, University of Southampton, Princess Anne Hospital, Level G, Coxford Road, Southampton, United Kingdom.
N E Morton

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sample of 95 sib pairs affected with insulin-dependent diabetes and typed with their normal parents for 28 markers on chromosome 6 has been analyzed by several methods. When appropriate parameters are efficiently estimated, a parametric model is equivalent to the beta model, which is superior to nonparametric alternatives both in single point tests (as found previously) and in multipoint tests. Theory is given for meta-analysis combined with allelic association, and problems that may be associated with errors of map location and/or marker typing are identified. Reducing by multipoint analysis the number of association tests in a dense map can give a 3-fold reduction in the critical lod, and therefore in the cost of positional cloning.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6Genetic LinkageModels, StatisticalAdultChildChromosome MappingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HLA AntigensHumansLod ScoreNuclear FamilyProbabilitySoftwareStatistics, NonparametricHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID9144239
PMCPMC24680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.