Trial reportJournal of behavioral medicine1997
Take Heart II: replication of a worksite health promotion trial.
Trial report in Journal of behavioral medicine, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00005723 (Worksite Issues in Organizational Health Promotion), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Worksite Issues in Organizational Health Promotion (Take Heart)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of total fat intake on body weight.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Reduced or modified dietary fat for preventing cardiovascular disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Design of a randomized controlled trial for multiple cancer risk behaviors among Spanish-speaking Mexican-origin smokers.BMC public health · 2013Trial
- The effects of a controlled worksite environmental intervention on determinants of dietary behavior and self-reported fruit, vegetable and fat intake.BMC public health · 2006Trial
- Effectiveness of a worksite intervention to reduce an occupational exposure: the Minnesota wood dust study.American journal of public health · 2002Trial
- Worksite Opportunities for Wellness (WOW): effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors after 1 year.Preventive medicineTrial
- Does worksite social capital enhance retention into a worksite weight-loss programme?Obesity science & practice · 2016Article
- Changes in skinfold thickness and waist circumference after 12 and 24 months resulting from the NHF-NRG In Balance-project.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2010Article
- A social-ecologic approach to assessing support for disease self-management: the Chronic Illness Resources Survey.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2000Article
- A Translational Worksite Diabetes Prevention Trial Improves Psychosocial Status, Dietary Intake, and Step Counts among Employees with Prediabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Preventive medicine reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a revised worksite health promotion program that featured an employee steering committee/menu approach to intervention. The "Take Heart II" program was evaluated using a quasi-experimental matched-pair design with worksite as the unit of analysis. Experimental and control worksites did not differ on baseline organizational or employee demographic variables or on baseline levels of dependent variables. Outcome and process results revealed consistent, but modest effects favoring intervention worksites on most measures. Cross-sectional analyses generally failed to produce statistically significant intervention effects, but cohort analyses revealed significant beneficial effects of the Take Heart II intervention on eating patterns, behavior change attempts, and perceived social support. Neither analysis detected a beneficial effect of intervention on cholesterol levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9144037What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.