ReviewDrugs & aging1997
Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Practical treatment guidelines.
Review in Drugs & aging, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- A Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine Combined with Tamsulosin or Doxazosin in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Trial
- A randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release doxazosin and tamsulosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in Brazil.International journal of clinical practice · 2006Trial
- Structural and Functional Diversity of Animal Toxins Interacting With GPCRs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Commentary: Doxazosin for alcoholism.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2013Article
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia: An overview of existing treatment.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2011Article
- Effects of α-blocker 'add on' treatment on blood pressure in symptomatic BPH with or without concomitant hypertension.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2010Article
- Review
- Medical and minimally invasive therapies for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2006Review
- Clinical ease of using doxazosin in BPH patients with and without hypertension.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2005Review
- Dutasteride.Drugs & aging · 2003Review
- Review
- Tamsulosin: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms.Drugs & aging · 2002Review
- Review
- [Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia].Atencion primaria · 2000Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in older men and has a significant impact on their daily lives. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy are currently the most effective therapies for BPH. TURP is, however, associated with clinically significant adverse events in 20% of patients. Therefore, patients who need treatment for BPH based on the presence of symptoms should also be offered other therapy options. Transurethral incision of the prostate is an effective therapy with minimal adverse effects in patients with a prostate not larger than 30 g. Minimally invasive procedures, such as electrovaporisation, laser prostatectomy, transurethral needle ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound, transurethral microwave therapy and insertion of prostatic stents, can be performed instead of the standard surgical procedures. They are either performed as outpatient procedures or are associated with shorter durations of hospitalisation than TURP; in addition, they can also be performed in high risk patients. The efficacy of these procedures lies between that of TURP and medical therapy. Medical therapy is becoming increasingly important in the treatment of patients with moderate symptoms of BPH. Both androgen-suppressing therapy and alpha-adrenoceptor blockade are well tolerated and effective modalities. Compared with placebo, both types of therapy produce improvements in maximum urinary flat rate and reductions in symptom scores of 15 to 20%. Finasteride, a potent 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, must be given for 6 months before it effectiveness in a given patient can be assessed, and for at least 12 months to achieve maximum prostate shrinkage and the full extent of its other beneficial effects. This may be perceived as a disadvantage when compared with the rapid relief afforded by surgery or alpha-blockade. The efficacy of finasteride is also dependent on prostate size; it should not be tried in patients with a prostate volume of < 40 ml. On the other hand, finasteride may reverse the progression of the disease process. Of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, terazosin, doxazosin and tamsulosin can be administered once daily. In contrast, prazosin, alfuzosin and indoramin must be administered twice daily, which may have a negative impact on patient compliance. Because of its specificity for alpha 1A-receptors, no dosage titration is needed when tamsulosin is used; in addition, in contrast with the other alpha-blockers used in BPH, tamsulosin lacks significant effects on blood pressure. On the other hand, nonselective alpha-blockers are preferable in hypertensive patients with BPH. The final decision about the best treatment for a particular patient must take into account the patient's preference after he has been informed of the different options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.