Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9134489›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics1997

Procuring gametes for research and therapy: the argument for unisex altruism--a response to Donald Evans.

D L Dickenson

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D L DickensonOpen University, Milton Keynes.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a troublesome anomaly in the UK between cash payment to men for sperm donation and the effective assumption that women will pay to donate eggs. Some commentators, including Donald Evans in this journal, have argued that the anomaly should be resolved by treating women on the same terms as men. But this argument ignores important difficulties about property in the body, particularly in relation to gametes. There are good reasons for thinking that the contract model and payment for gametes are both inappropriate, and that a model based on altruism should be applied to both sexes.

Indexed as

AltruismCommodificationEthics, MedicalFees and ChargesSemenSpermatozoaContractsDirected Tissue DonationFemaleHuman BodyHuman ExperimentationHumansMaleOocyte DonationReproductive TechniquesTissue and Organ ProcurementGenetics and ReproductionHealth Care and Public HealthHuman Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

Identifiers

PMID9134489
PMCPMC1377208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.