Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9132409›Full record

ReviewJournal of bioenergetics and biomembranes1996

Perspectives on the mitochondrial multiple conductance channel.

K W Kinnally, T A Lohret, M L Campo, C A Mannella

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Mitochondrial Permeability Transition in Mitochondrial Disorders.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Physiologic functions of cyclophilin D and the mitochondrial permeability transition pore.Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. MCC and PSC, the putative protein import channels of mitochondria.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2000
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Mitochondrial channels revisited.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 1996
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K W KinnallyDivision of Molecular Medicine, Wadsworth Center, Empire State Plaza, Albany, New York 12201-0509, USA.
T A Lohret
M L Campo
C A Mannella
University at Albany, State University of New York · USUniversidad de Extremadura · ESWadsworth Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A multiple conductance channel (MCC) with a peak conductance of over 1 nS is recorded from mitoplasts (mitochondria with the inner membrane exposed) using patch-clamp techniques. MCC shares many general characteristics with other intracellular megachannels, many of which are weakly selective, voltage-dependent, and calcium sensitive. A role in protein import is suggested by the transient blockade of MCC by peptides responsible for targeting mitochondrial precursor proteins. MCC is compared with the peptide-sensitive channel of the outer membrane because of similarities in targeting peptide blockade. The pharmacology and regulation of MCC by physiological effectors are reviewed and compared with the properties of the pore hypothesized to be responsible for the mitochondrial inner membrane permeability transition.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric ConductivityHumansIntracellular MembranesIon ChannelsMembrane PotentialsMitochondriaIon Channelspeptide sensitive channel

Identifiers

PMID9132409
OpenAlexW1984995129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.