Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9131486›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics1996

Cytochrome P4503A (CYP3A) metabolism: prediction of in vivo activity in humans.

G R Wilkinson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacokinetics and biopharmaceutics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 310 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

G R WilkinsonDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

YOHIMBINE THERAPY IN AUTONOMIC FAILUREP01GM031304 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STEIN, CHARLES M. · 1985 to 2006
$8.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM31304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CYP3A is one of the most important cytochrome P450 isoforms responsible for drug metabolism by humans because it is the major such enzyme in critical tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract and liver, and it is involved in the oxidative biotransformation of numerous clinically useful therapeutic agents. Many factors regulate CYP3A expression but these are being increasingly defined so that the disposition characteristics of a drug whose metabolism is importantly mediated by this isoform can be reasonably well predicted a priori. For example, metabolic clearance is distributed within a population in a unimodal fashion but marked (5- to 20-fold) interindividual variability is present as a consequence of both genetic and nongenetic factors. In addition, first-pass metabolism occurs following oral drug administration and this may be extensive so that bioavailability is low. CYP3A activity can also be readily modulated by inducers like rifampicin and several anticonvulsant agents, and many potent inhibitors exist such as azole antifungal agents and macrolide antibiotics. Accordingly, the potential for drug interactions with these drugs as well as other CYP3A substrates, when given concomitantly, is high. Metabolism involving CYP3A is also likely to be affected by liver disease as well as aging, and modest differences may be present between men and women but these are often clinically unimportant. Because of such predictability, knowledge of the role and importance of CYP3A in the metabolism of a putative drug candidate is becoming increasingly desirable at an early stage in the development process. In vitro studies using human liver preparations, including microsomes, cultured hepatocytes and heterologous expressed enzymes, can provide important insights in this regard. This is particularly the case for identifying potential drug interactions whose clinical significance can be subsequently assessed. Data with respect to terfenadine and cyclosporine obtained several years after their approval and marketing, indicate that, if available and applied during their development, the paradigm of using in vitro studies to rationally direct and prioritize clinical studies would have prospectively prevented the serious adverse effects and inefficacy that were only recognized during their empiric clinical use. Such examples, along with those associated with the genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6, provide strong justification for establishing the role and importance of individual CYP isoforms in a candidate drug's metabolism at an early stage.

Indexed as

Aryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesBiotransformationCyclosporineCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrug DesignDrug InteractionsEnzyme InductionFemaleGenetic VariationHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIntestinal MucosaLiverMaleAryl Hydrocarbon HydroxylasesCyclosporineCytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemHistamine H1 AntagonistsImmunosuppressive AgentsOxidoreductases, N-DemethylatingPharmaceutical PreparationsTerfenadine

Identifiers

PMID9131486
OpenAlexW2060317640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.