Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9120650›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine1996

Differences in end-of-life decision making among black and white ambulatory cancer patients.

E D McKinley, J M Garrett, A T Evans, M Danis

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01358110 (Emergency Department-Based Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01358110 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Emergency Department-Based Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2011 to 2015Enrolled136ConditionsAdvanced Cancer, Metastatic CancerArmsEarly palliative care consultation, Care as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Preferences for aggressive care in underserved populations with advanced-stage lung cancer: looking beyond race and resuscitation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Advance Directive in End of Life Decision-Making among the Yoruba of South-Western Nigeria.BEOnline : journal of the West African bioethics training program · 2016
    Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E D McKinleyDepartment of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio 44109-1998, USA.
J M Garrett
A T Evans
M Danis
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMetroHealth Medical Center · USRobert Wood Johnson Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAfrican-American (black) and white individuals have been shown to differ in their desire for life-sustaining treatments and their use of living wills for end-of-life care, but the reasons for these differences are unclear. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that these ethnic differences exist because black patients trust the health care system less, fear inadequate medical treatment more, and feel less confident that living wills can give them more control over their terminal care.

designCross-sectional, in-person survey conducted from November 1993 to June 1994.

settingTwo medical oncology clinics with 40% to 50% black patient representation.

participantsAmbulatory cancer patients, 92 black and 114 white, who were awaiting their physician visits and agreed to participate (76% of those eligible). Patients were excluded if they were under age 40 or if they had nonmelanoma skin cancer only. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBlack ambulatory cancer patients wanted more life-sustaining treatments (odds ratio [OR] 2.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-5.3), and were less likely to want to complete a living will at some time in the future (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.17-0.75) than were white patients after controlling for socioeconomic variables. However, these differences were not related to lack of trust or fear of inadequate medical treatment in this study population. Both groups of patients trusted the health care system and felt that physicians treated patients equally well. Neither group feared inadequate or excessive medical care, and the majority of both groups agreed that living wills would help them keep control over their terminal care.

conclusionsBlack and white cancer patients make different end-of-life choices, even after adjusting for likely explanatory variables. The other factors that influence decision making remain unclear and need to be further explored if physicians are to understand and help their patients make choices for end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Decision MakingTerminal CareAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLiving WillsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutpatientsPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID9120650
OpenAlexW2045727143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.