Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9118582›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics1996

Bayesian forecasting in paediatric populations.

M M Fernández de Gatta, M J García, J M Lanao, A Domínguez-Gil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M M Fernández de GattaDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, University of Salamanca, Spain.
M J García
J M Lanao
A Domínguez-Gil

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian forecasting offers several important advantages for dosage individualisation in children, although, unlike for adults, its use in this population is much lower. Indeed, currently Bayesian methods are underused in this patient population. The paucity of paediatric population pharmacokinetic parameters, and the unavailability of specific clinical pharmacokinetic software for the whole paediatric population, are the main limitations to the application of Bayesian methods in these patients. When these problems have been overcome, this approach will allow clinicians to achieve therapeutic concentrations more readily, faster and more precisely, thus making the methodology highly attractive in the paediatric setting.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremPharmacokineticsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.