Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9116386›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA1996

Different risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures: a prospective study.

W C Graafmans, M E Ooms, P D Bezemer, L M Bouter, P Lips

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bone health in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Physical function trajectory after wrist or lower arm fracture in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  5. How does trauma secondary to unexpected extreme weather affect orthopaedic surgery departments? An epidemiological study on the Filomena snowstorm.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gout and Risk of Fracture in Women: A Prospective Cohort Study.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2017
    Observational
  12. Postural Stability in Older Adults with a Distal Radial Fracture.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2016
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Gender-specific hip fracture risk in community-dwelling and institutionalized seniors age 65 years and older.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Active commuting reduces the risk of wrist fractures in middle-aged women-the UFO study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Article
  18. Burden of non-hip, non-vertebral fractures on quality of life in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W C GraafmansInstitute for Research in Extramural Medicine (EMGO Institute), Vrije Universiteit Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M E Ooms
P D Bezemer
L M Bouter
P Lips
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a prospective cohort of elderly persons, aged 70 years and over, we examined risk indicators for which data could be easily obtained, to construct risk profiles for hip fractures and distal forearm fractures. Participants lived independently, in apartment houses for the elderly or in homes for the elderly. At baseline, information was obtained in 2578 subjects on age, gender, residence, mobility and the frequency of going outdoors. Mobility was measured using a walking score ranging from 1 (not able to walk independently) to 3 (able to walk independently for a fair distance). During the study period (median duration 3.5 years, maximum 4 years) 106 participants sustained a hip fracture and 60 participants suffered a distal forearm fracture. Women compared with men, adjusted for age, had a higher risk of hip fracture (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-4.3) and distal forearm fracture (RR = 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.2). Age, adjusted for gender, was related to hip fractures only: the relative risk of fracture for those in the highest age category (> 85 years) was 9.5 (95% CI 4.3-21.2) compared with those in the lowest age category (70-75 years). Moderately impaired walking ability compared with normal walking ability, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with a higher risk of hip fracture (RR = 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7) but with a lower risk of distal forearm fracture (RR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8). The outdoor score, adjusted for age and gender, was associated with distal forearm fractures only: going outdoors less than once a week, compared with three times or more, was associated with a lower risk of fractures (RR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9). In those living in homes for the elderly the risk of hip fracture was higher compared with those living independently (RR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2), adjusted for age and gender. Risk profiles were constructed using stepwise Cox's proportional-hazards regression. The risk profile predicted probabilities of sustaining a hip fracture in a 4-year period ranging from 0.4% to 25.9%, and of distal forearm fractures ranging from 0.2% to 4.5%, depending on the subject's characteristics as defined by the risk indicators. We conclude that easily obtainable risk indicators can be used in the prediction of fractures and can discriminate among fracture types.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHip FracturesHumansIncidenceLife StyleMalePredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRadius FracturesRisk FactorsUlna Fractures

Identifiers

PMID9116386
OpenAlexW1975014657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.