ReviewMolecular biology reports1996
Features of autoantigens.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoantibodies as predictors of disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2001Article
- Autoantibodies and overlap syndromes in autoimmune rheumatic disease.Journal of clinical pathology · 2001Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The major cellular antigens recognized by autoantibodies in SLE and other systemic autoimmune diseases have been identified and characterized over the past 25 years. The pioneering studies of Eng Tan demonstrate the importance of autoantibodies as diagnostic markers. However, why certain autoantibodies, such as anti-Sm, are pathognomonic of SLE, while others are markers of other autoimmune disease subsets, remains unanswered. This central question continues to drive much current research into the pathogenesis of SLE. Features of the autoantigens recognized by autoantibodies may provide important clues to the causes of lupus. Most autoantigens in systemic autoimmunity are multicomponent nucleoprotein complexes. These particles are encountered by the immune system as units, resulting in the tandem production of autoantibodies recognizing several components of the same complex. However, the intermolecular-intrastructural spreading of autoimmunity is regulated by mechanisms that at present are defined poorly. Also unexplained is the observation that the antigenic determinants recognized by autoantibodies are restricted and frequently correspond to active sites or functional domains. Analysis of experimental models of autoimmunity suggests that altering the structure of autoantigens, due to abnormal protein-protein interactions, hapten binding, altered degradation, or other mechanisms, could help to explain both the restricted patterns of autoantibody spreading and the selective targeting of antigenic sites. This may be a worthwhile area for further investigation of the pathogenesis of systemic autoimmune diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.