ReviewMolecular biology reports1996
RNA recognition by autoantigens and autoantibodies.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nonrandom packaging of host RNAs in moloney murine leukemia virus.Journal of virology · 2005Article
- Autoimmune epitopes in messenger RNA.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2002Article
- Aberrant expression of fetal RNA-binding protein p62 in liver cancer and liver cirrhosis.The American journal of pathology · 2001Article
- Translational Control of the Picornavirus Phenotype.Molecular biology · 2001Article
- Macromolecular mimicry.The EMBO journal · 2000Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The La, Ro, Sm and RNP autoantigens have been intensely studied over the past decade since cDNAs encoding autoantigens have been available. Most of these autoantigens are closely associated with RNA in RNP particles and molecular studies have provided insights into their modes of recognition and binding to RNA. For example, a common RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) was found to be a critical component of the RNA-binding domain of these autoantigens and the three dimensional structure of the RRM has been solved. As described in other articles in this series, the presence of La, Ro, Sm and RNP autoantibodies correlates with disease subsets, such as Sjogren's syndrome, systemic lupus erythematous and other connective tissue diseases. Immunological analysis of sera from autoimmune patients using recombinant autoantigens has revealed that multiple epitopes reside along the proteins and these represent both continuous and discontinuous (conformational) autotopes. Findings to date support a model of autoantibody induction which involves the direct presentation of proteinaceous autoantigens to the immune system. Circumstantial evidence has suggested that immunological crossreactivity between systemic autoantigens and structural components of infectious agents may play an initial role in the autoimmune response to certain antigens. However, the etiology of autoimmune diseases is probably multifactoral with genetic and other immune features acting on the organismal level. In addition, RNA molecules themselves can be autoantigens with higher order structural conformations which are recognized by RNP-type autoantibodies. Immune crossreactivity and/or direct presentation may generate autoantibodies reactive with conformational RNA epitopes. If crossreactivity with components of cellular or infectious agents give rise to RNA epitopes, they may represent structural or functional mimetics of the primary epitopes that actually drive the response. These ideas are discussed with respect to the role of mimetic processes in molecular recognition during autoimmunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.