Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9111984›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien1997

Distribution of physicians in Ontario. Where are there too few or too many family physicians and general practitioners?

P C Coyte, M Catz, M Stricker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Laboratory test use and primary care physician supply.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2013
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Accessing primary care services.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997
    Article
  7. Practice intensity: urban vs rural.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P C CoyteDepartment of Health Administration, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON.
M Catz
M Stricker

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the regional distribution of family physicians and general practitioners in Ontario after adjusting for practice intensity and the population's patterns of health care use.

designAnalysis of administrative data.

settingOntario.

main outcome measuresIntensity of patient use of GP services, GP practice density, and physician density for each Ontario county (measured as the ratio of practice-intensity equivalent GPs to use-intensity equivalent inhabitants).

resultsDespite adjustment for practice intensity and use patterns, wide variations exist in GP densities. chi 2 tests identified counties that consistently reported GP densities significantly different (P < 0.001) from the provincial average. Four of the five counties with health science teaching centres had densities significantly higher than the provincial average, while 10 other counties had significantly lower densities.

conclusionsResults of this study provide useful information for physician resource planning and might inform debate concerning proposals to restrict physician billing numbers and practice locations to rectify perceived maldistribution of physicians.

Indexed as

Family PracticeMedically Underserved AreaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPhysicians, FamilyPopulation DensityProfessional Practice LocationWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID9111984
PMCPMC2255471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.