ReviewSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)1997
Effort perception in children.
Review in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reliability of ratings of perceived exertion during progressive treadmill exercise.British journal of sports medicine · 1999Trial
- "CoVidentary": An online exercise training program to reduce sedentary behaviours in children with type 1 diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical & translational endocrinology · 2021Article
- The Use of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- OMNI Scale of Perceived Exertion: mixed gender and race validation for Singapore children during cycle exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2012Article
- Muscle fatigue during high-intensity exercise in children.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2006Review
- Perceived exertion : influence of age and cognitive development.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2006Review
- Dalhousie dyspnea scales: construct and content validity of pictorial scales for measuring dyspnea.BMC pediatrics · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies addressing children's perceptions of exercise effort have appeared steadily in the scientific literature over the last 20 years, though they have been relatively sparse in number. With little or no regard for their suitability, researchers initially applied to children the methods and applications of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) notion established amongst adults. Whilst some success was claimed, findings were inconclusive, possibly because of the use of an inappropriate measurement scale. More recently, the development of the child-specific Children's Effort Rating Table (CERT) has advanced research in this domain and helped to focus attention on the numerous problems of applying this psychophysical concept to such immature subjects. Accordingly, the scope for further research in this discipline is now far broader than ever before.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9108634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.