ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics1997
Strategies for mapping heterogeneous recessive traits by allele-sharing methods.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contribution of Inbred Singletons to Variance Component Estimation of Heritability and Linkage.Human heredity · 2018Article
- Linkage analysis in the next-generation sequencing era.Human heredity · 2011Review
- A novel class of tests for the detection of mitochondrial DNA-mutation involvement in diseases.American journal of human genetics · 2003Article
- The power and statistical behaviour of allele-sharing statistics when applied to models with two disease loci.Journal of genetics · 2002Article
- Statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis of X-linked traits in general pedigrees.American journal of human genetics · 2002Article
- A survey of affected-sibship statistics for nonparametric linkage analysis.American journal of human genetics · 2001Article
- Simple, robust linkage tests for affected sibs.American journal of human genetics · 1998Article
- Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: single-marker evaluation.American journal of human genetics · 1997Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate strategies for detecting linkage of recessive and partially recessive traits, using sibling pairs and inbred individuals. We assume that a genomewide search is being conducted and that locus heterogeneity of the trait is likely. For sibling pairs, we evaluate the efficiency of different statistics under the assumption that one does not know the true degree of recessiveness of the trait. We recommend a sibling-pair statistic that is a linear compromise between two previously suggested statistics. We also compare the power of sibling pairs to that of more distant relatives, such as cousins. For inbred individuals, we evaluate the power of offspring of different types of matings and compare them to sibling pairs. Over a broad range of trait etiologies, sibling pairs are more powerful than inbred individuals, but for traits caused by very rare alleles, particularly in the case of heterogeneity, inbred individuals can be much more powerful. The models we develop can also be used to examine specific situations other than those we look at. We present this analysis in the idealized context of a dense set of highly polymorphic markers. In general, incorporation of real-world complexities makes inbred individuals, particularly offspring of distant relatives, look slightly less useful than our results imply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
9106544PMC1712456What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.