Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9102063›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA1997

Serum fluoride and serum osteocalcin levels in response to a novel sustained-release monofluorophosphate preparation: comparison with plain monofluorophosphate.

A Battmann, H Resch, C R Libanati, D Ludy, M Fischer, S Farley, D J Baylink

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluoride for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  2. Measurement of total and diffusible serum fluoride.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 1999
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A BattmannInstitut für Pathologie, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, Germany.
H Resch
C R Libanati
D Ludy
M Fischer
S Farley
D J Baylink
Loma Linda University · USOrdensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · ATUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a previous study we found that sustained-release monofluorophosphate (MFP-SR), a novel, sustained-release MFP preparation, acutely maintained the basal therapeutic serum fluoride levels without causing the high serum peak levels associated with plain MFP administration. The objective of the present study was to determine (a) whether chronic MFP-SR administration would provide therapeutic serum fluoride levels, and (b) whether treatment with this new preparation would result in an increase in bone formation similar to that achieved with plain MFP. Bone formation was assessed by serum osteocalcin (OC) determination. We studied 17 postmenopausal women older than 60 years and suffering from primary osteoporosis. All had received a minimum of 6 months of continuous treatment with plain MFP at a dose of 152 mg/day (76 mg b.i.d.). Upon entering the study, the subjects were randomized, in a double-masked protocol, to receive either MFP-SR (76 mg b.i.d.) (n = 9) or placebo (n = 8) for 2 months, after which all subjects returned to the original plain MFP regimen. Serum fluoride and serum OC levels were determined monthly for 3 months. At the beginning of the study serum fluoride levels were in the accepted therapeutic range (5-10 microM) in all patients. Serum fluoride levels were maintained in the patients switched to MFP-SR. In contrast, serum fluoride levels decreased significantly (p < 0.005) in the placebo-treated control subjects and returned to therapeutic levels upon switching back to plain MFP. Similarly, serum OC levels remained elevated in the subjects switched to MFP-SR but dropped significantly (p < 0.001) in the placebo-treated group. Our results demonstrate that chronic MFP-SR administration, at a dose of 152 mg/day, results in maintenance of therapeutic serum fluoride levels and in stimulation of bone formation. Because we have previously reported that high, supratherapeutic post-absorptive serum fluoride levels are avoided by MFP-SR administration, this novel preparation may prevent side effects associated with plain MFP by reducing the amount of fluoride deposited in bone.

Indexed as

AgedDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFluoridesHumansMiddle AgedOsteocalcinOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPhosphatesDelayed-Action PreparationsFluoridesfluorophosphateOsteocalcinPhosphates

Identifiers

PMID9102063
OpenAlexW2003660969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.