Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9102059›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA1997

Nandrolone decanoate and intranasal calcitonin as therapy in established osteoporosis.

L Flicker, J L Hopper, R G Larkins, M Lichtenstein, G Buirski, J D Wark

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Calcitonin: A useful old friend.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2002
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L FlickerUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
J L Hopper
R G Larkins
M Lichtenstein
G Buirski
J D Wark
University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used a randomized, 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate over 2 years the effect of intranasal salmon calcitonin and intramuscular nandrolone decanoate on bone mass in elderly women with established osteoporosis. The study was double masked in relation to calcitonin and open in relation to nandrolone decanoate. One hundred and twenty-three women aged 60-88 years who had sustained a previous osteoporotic fracture, or had osteopenia, were recruited through an outpatient clinic. Women were assigned to one of four groups: (1) daily placebo nasal spray, (2) 400 IU intranasal calcitonin daily, (3) 20 intramuscular injections of 50 mg nandrolone decanoate (given as two courses of 10 injections) plus placebo nasal spray, or (4) 20 injections of 50 mg nandrolone decanoate plus 400 IU intranasal calcitonin daily. All subjects received 1000 mg calcium supplementation daily. Outcomes measured included changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, as measured by dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (DEQCT), in BMD of the proximal femur, and BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine and forearm, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Significant positive changes from baseline in DXA BMC at the lumbar spine were observed over 2 years in the calcitonin group (5.0 +/- 1.9%, mean +/- SE) and in the nandrolone deconate group (4.7 +/- 1.9%) but not in the placebo group (1.1 +/- 2.2%) or the combined therapy group (0.7 +/- 1.8%). Modelling based on the 2 x 2 factorial design revealed that nandrolone decanoate was associated with a 3.8 +/- 1.8% (p < 0.05) gain in DXA BMD at the proximal femur. Modelling also revealed that calcitonin treatment was associated with a loss of 11.5 +/- 4.7% in DEQCT BMD at the lumbar spine and a loss of 3.7 +/- 1.8% in DXA BMD at the proximal femur (p < 0.05). There was in vivo antagonism between the two medications of 7.9 +/- 3.9% for DXA BMC at the lumbar spine. Both agents caused positive changes from baseline in lumbar spine BMC. Nandrolone decanoate had beneficial effects on BMD at the proximal femur. This dose of intranasal calcitonin was associated with deleterious effects on trabecular BMD at the lumbar spine and total BMD at the proximal femur. There may be significant clinical antagonism between these two medications.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAgedAged, 80 and overAnabolic AgentsBone DensityCalcitoninDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNandroloneNandrolone DecanoateOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalProspective StudiesAnabolic AgentsCalcitoninNandroloneNandrolone Decanoate

Identifiers

PMID9102059
OpenAlexW1963531727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.