Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9096104›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society1997

A first catalog of genes involved in pig ovarian follicular differentiation.

G Tosser-Klopp, F Benne, A Bonnet, P Mulsant, F Gasser, F Hatey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in swine transcriptomics.International journal of biological sciences · 2007
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The cytogenetic map of the domestic pig.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G Tosser-KloppLaboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches de Toulouse, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan cedex, France.
F Benne
A Bonnet
P Mulsant
F Gasser
F Hatey
Laboratoire de Génétique Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a first step toward the characterization of genetic expression in pig ovaries, we have selected 238 clones by differential hybridization from a pig granulosa cell cDNA library, using probes prepared from RNA extracted from either untreated or FSH-treated cells and, in order to generate expressed sequence tags (ESTs), we have performed 3' and 5' single-pass sequencing of these clones. Sequences of the 3' end of the 167 clones that produced informative sequence data were first compared with each other, revealing a redundancy level of 21%. Sequences from the 136 unique clones were analyzed for similarities with sequence data included in Genbank and EMBL databases. Among these unique clones, 54 (40%) matched significantly with sequences from either Genbank of EMBL: 4 with known genes in pig, 35 matched with previously reported human genes, and 15 with other mammalian genes. Eighty-two clones (60%) showed no significant match with any gene or DNA sequence in the Genbank and EMBL databases and thus may represent new pig transcripts.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCloning, MolecularDatabases, FactualDNA, ComplementaryFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneGene Expression RegulationGranulosa CellsHumansMolecular Sequence DataRNA, MessengerSwineDNA, ComplementaryFollicle Stimulating HormoneRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID9096104
OpenAlexW2040179651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.