Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9092637›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research1997

Transfer RNA docking pair model in the ribosomal pre- and post-translocational states.

K Nagano, N Nagano

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K NaganoDepartment of Information Dynamics, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakaecho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173, Japan. knagano@info.ncc.go.jp
N Nagano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A consensus has been reached that the conformation of the anticodon-codon interactions of two adjacent tRNA molecules on the ribosome is a Sundaralingam-type (S-type). Even if it is kept to the S-type, there are still various possibilities. Various experimental data have been supporting an idea that the conformation of A-site tRNA is different from that of P-site tRNA. Those data as well as the recent result of Brimacombe and co-workers that U20:1 of lupin tRNAmMetbound to the A-site was cross-linked to a region, 875-905, of 23S rRNA in combination with the other recent findings of Nierhaus and co-workers about the spin-contrast method of neutron diffraction of the ribosome and the better accessible nucleotide patterns of phosphorothioated tRNAs on the ribosome have led to a new tRNA docking pair model, in which the highly conserved G18 and G19 of D-loop in A-site tRNA and C56 and C61 of TpsiC-loop in P-site tRNA base pair along with the conventional base pairs of adjacent codon-anticodon interactions. This A-P tRNA pair model can be translocated to the P-E tRNA pair model without changing the conformation except the ACCA termini, keeping the position of the growing nascent polypeptide chain.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationBase CompositionBase SequenceBinding SitesComputer SimulationEscherichia coliPlantsRibosomesRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, TransferRNA, Transfer, MetRNA, Transfer, SerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSoftwareRNA, Ribosomal, 23SRNA, TransferRNA, Transfer, MetRNA, Transfer, Ser

Identifiers

PMID9092637
PMCPMC146551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.