Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9087496›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy1997

An axenic amastigote system for drug screening.

H L Callahan, A C Portal, R Devereaux, M Grogl

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Susceptibility ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of the aggregated protein dye YAT2150 onAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel Schiff bases of Vanillin: potent inhibitors of macrophage harboredJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2023
    Article
  8. Human Lung Cancer (A549) Cell Line Cytotoxicity and Anti-Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Availability, Toxicology and Medical Significance of Antimony.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Determination of anti-leishmanial drugs efficacy againstParasite epidemiology and control · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of synergy between host and pathogen-directed therapies against intracellular Leishmania donovani.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H L CallahanU.S. Army Medical Research Unit-Brazil. Heather_Callahan@WRSMTP-CCMAIL.ARMY.MIL
A C Portal
R Devereaux
M Grogl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently available primary screens for selection of candidate antileishmanial compounds are not ideal. The choices include screens that are designed to closely reflect the situation in vivo but are labor-intensive and expensive (intracellular amastigotes and animal models) and screens that are designed to facilitate rapid testing of a large number of drugs but do not use the clinically relevant parasite stage (promastigote model). The advent of successful in vitro culture of axenic amastigotes permits the development of a primary screen which is quick and easy like the promastigote screen but still representative of the situation in vivo, since it uses the relevant parasite stage. We have established an axenic amastigote drug screening system using a Leishmania mexicana strain (strain M379). A comparison of the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) drug sensitivity profiles of M379 promastigotes, intracellular amastigotes, and axenic amastigotes for six clinically relevant antileishmanial drugs (sodium stibogluconate, meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine, paromomycin, amphotericin B, WR6026) showed that M379 axenic amastigotes are a good model for a primary drug screen. Promastigote and intracellular amastigote IC50s differed for four of the six drugs tested by threefold or more; axenic amastigote and intracellular amastigote IC50s differed by twofold for only one drug. This shows that the axenic amastigote susceptibility to clinically used reference drugs is comparable to the susceptibility of amastigotes in macrophages. These data also suggest that for the compounds tested, susceptibility is intrinsic to the parasite stage. This contradicts previous hypotheses that suggested that the activities of antimonial agents against intracellular amastigotes were solely a function of the macrophage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsCell LineDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLeishmania mexicanaMacrophagesMiceAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID9087496
PMCPMC163801
OpenAlexW1479952727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.