Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9087441›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1997

Genetic analysis of myoblast fusion: blown fuse is required for progression beyond the prefusion complex.

S K Doberstein, R D Fetter, A Y Mehta, C S Goodman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cells · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Annual review of genetics · 2019
    Review
  8. The fusogenic synapse at a glance.Journal of cell science · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. MYO18A: An unusual myosin.Advances in biological regulation · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of myoblast fusion during muscle development.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S K DobersteinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
R D Fetter
A Y Mehta
C S Goodman
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The events of myoblast fusion in Drosophila are dissected here by combining genetic analysis with light and electron microscopy. We describe a new and essential intermediate step in the process, the formation of a prefusion complex consisting of "paired vesicles." These pairs of vesicles from different cells align with each other across apposed plasma membranes. This prefusion complex resolves into dense membrane plaques between apposed cells; these cells then establish cytoplasmic continuity by fusion of small areas of plasma membrane followed by vesiculation of apposed membranes. Different steps in this process are specifically blocked by mutations in four genes required for myoblast fusion. One of these genes, blown fuse, encodes a novel cytoplasmic protein expressed in unfused myoblasts that is essential for progression beyond the prefusion complex stage.

Indexed as

Drosophila ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCell AdhesionCell FusionCloning, MolecularDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular Sequence DataMorphogenesisMuscle ProteinsMusclesblow protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMuscle Proteins

Identifiers

PMID9087441
PMCPMC2132517
OpenAlexW2169274584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.