Evidence map›Paper›PMID 9083660›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal1997

Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds.

E Evans, K Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 1997. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 777 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
777citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

777 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Experiments, Analysis, and Simulations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Switching Spike Plasticity Shapes ACE2 Engagement Across SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Forces in mechanically interlocked materials.Chemical Society reviews · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Factors modulating the assembly of human βNature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Evolution of N-terminal mechanical lability as a determinant for Type III secretion.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

717 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E EvansDepartment of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. evans@physics.ubc.ca
K Ritchie

Funding

RHEOLOGICAL AND ADHERENCE PROPERTIES OF SICKLE CELLSR01HL031579 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI NARLA, MOHANDAS · 1985 to 2010
$3.8M
MOLECULAR FORCES IN BLOOD/VASCULAR CELL ADHESIONR01HL054700 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NEEDHAM, DAVID · 1995 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HL 31579NHLBI NIH HHS HL 54700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biology, molecular linkages at, within, and beneath cell interfaces arise mainly from weak noncovalent interactions. These bonds will fail under any level of pulling force if held for sufficient time. Thus, when tested with ultrasensitive force probes, we expect cohesive material strength and strength of adhesion at interfaces to be time- and loading rate-dependent properties. To examine what can be learned from measurements of bond strength, we have extended Kramers' theory for reaction kinetics in liquids to bond dissociation under force and tested the predictions by smart Monte Carlo (Brownian dynamics) simulations of bond rupture. By definition, bond strength is the force that produces the most frequent failure in repeated tests of breakage, i.e., the peak in the distribution of rupture forces. As verified by the simulations, theory shows that bond strength progresses through three dynamic regimes of loading rate. First, bond strength emerges at a critical rate of loading (> or = 0) at which spontaneous dissociation is just frequent enough to keep the distribution peak at zero force. In the slow-loading regime immediately above the critical rate, strength grows as a weak power of loading rate and reflects initial coupling of force to the bonding potential. At higher rates, there is crossover to a fast regime in which strength continues to increase as the logarithm of the loading rate over many decades independent of the type of attraction. Finally, at ultrafast loading rates approaching the domain of molecular dynamics simulations, the bonding potential is quickly overwhelmed by the rapidly increasing force, so that only naked frictional drag on the structure remains to retard separation. Hence, to expose the energy landscape that governs bond strength, molecular adhesion forces must be examined over an enormous span of time scales. However, a significant gap exists between the time domain of force measurements in the laboratory and the extremely fast scale of molecular motions. Using results from a simulation of biotin-avidin bonds (Izrailev, S., S. Stepaniants, M. Balsera, Y. Oono, and K. Schulten. 1997. Molecular dynamics study of unbinding of the avidin-biotin complex. Biophys. J., this issue), we describe how Brownian dynamics can help bridge the gap between molecular dynamics and probe tests.

Indexed as

AvidinBiotinChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalComputer SimulationMathematicsMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingAvidinBiotin

Identifiers

PMID9083660
PMCPMC1184350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.